George McCaskey Says Bears Fans Would Get Over Move to Indiana
George McCaskey discussed a possible Chicago Bears relocation and why he believes fans would ultimately accept it.
There’s no easy way to talk about the Chicago Bears potentially leaving Illinois for Indiana.
And George McCaskey didn’t try to dress it up.
At the NFL’s annual meeting, McCaskey addressed the possibility of the Bears playing in Indiana and made it clear he doesn’t believe it would create a lasting divide with the fan base.
McCaskey Points to History, Not Emotion
McCaskey didn’t frame the issue around Chicago or tradition.
He went straight to precedent.
“I don’t think, in the end, it’s going to matter to people,” he said. “Back in 1976, the New York Football Giants went across state lines to New Jersey. They have been there ever since. The Jets joined them shortly thereafter. And then 35 years later, both teams had an opportunity to reevaluate their situations and recommitted to New Jersey.
“And somehow, the Republic has survived.”
It’s a practical argument.
Teams have moved before. Fans have adjusted. And the NFL has continued to grow.
Why This Conversation About the Bears Stadium Isn’t Going Away
The Chicago Bears are still weighing long-term stadium options.
That includes Chicago. It includes the Arlington Heights redevelopment site. And yes, it includes locations across state lines.
MORE: Bears Target Emmanuel McNeil-Warren to Fix Secondary in New Mock Draft
The Indiana idea has lingered because of what it could offer in terms of development and infrastructure. More space. Fewer restrictions. A cleaner path to building a modern stadium complex.
That doesn’t mean it’s the preferred outcome, but it’s clearly part of the conversation.
What Chicago Bears Fans Actually Care About
McCaskey’s comments are rooted in a belief that location matters less than results for Bears fans.
History suggests there’s some truth there.
The Giants and Jets still draw massive support despite playing in New Jersey. The identity of those franchises didn’t disappear when they crossed state lines.
But Chicago is not New York.
MORE: Luther Burden’s Rookie Production Put Him in Elite WR Company
The Bears are tied to the city in a way that goes beyond geography. That connection is part of the franchise’s identity, not just its address.
That’s where the tension lives.
The Bigger Picture for the Bears' Stadium
This isn’t just about where the Bears play. It’s about what comes with it.
A new stadium means:
- Increased revenue opportunities
- Enhanced fan experience
- The ability to host major events
Those factors drive decisions at the ownership level, and they don’t always align perfectly with how the fans feel.
The Bears' Bottom Line
McCaskey didn’t say fans would like a move to Indiana. But he did say they'd get over it.
That’s a different message, even if it feels a bit blunt.
Whether he’s right depends on how this process unfolds and where the Bears ultimately land. Until then, the possibility of home Chicago Bears games in Indiana remains on the table, and so does the reaction that would come with it.
